How Pathetic To Have To Pretend That These Are Real Questions…

And isn’t it time for every self-avowed liberty-activist to be shouting “NO!” in answer?


1. Can orders of a court commanding false speech—and particularly false testimonial speech— resistance to which has prompted a prosecution for alleged criminal contempt of court, be shielded from appellate Constitutional analysis and determination by application of the “collateral bar” doctrine?

2. Can a jury instruction removing from the jurors’ consideration and determination the statutory element of “lawful,” and explicitly instructing the jury that the unlawfulness or unconstitutionality of a court order is not a defense to a charge of criminal contempt, be properly shielded from appellate review by application of the “collateral bar” doctrine?

Read it and weep for the corruption that has taken hold of our institutions of government while too many of us were letting our “public servant chauffeurs” do all the driving instead of staying actively in charge of ourselves ourselves.


Read it, and get scared– because you should be. For yourselves and for your children.

Then, while the words of the petition’s conclusion are still ringing in your mind, get on the phone to the Institute for Justice, the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Rutherford Institute, the Center for Individual Rights, Judicial Watch, the ACLJ and even the ACLU.

SCREAM at these folks to stop wasting time with the cutesy little anti-this-regulation and anti-that-regulation lawsuits they crow about in their fund-raising campaigns. They are fussing with the window treatments while the house burns down.

These “public interest” organizations need to wake up and soldier-up against the actual, dire and immediate existential threat to the rule of law that is represented by what’s being done to Doreen. SCREAM at them to get their amicus briefs in RIGHT NOW.

Remind these folks that each and every one of the lawyers running their operations and working in their operations have sworn oaths to support the Constitution of the United States.

Make clear (and understand for yourself) that if the support doesn’t happen BEFORE the court decides whether or not to take the case, it will not take the case, and all the noise that might be made afterward will be too late.

Do this right now, before reading another word here.

Then tweet this link; “share” it… just do whatever has to be done to get it out there!

Get it on the screens of every journalist you can think of. Give them a chance to recognize our common peril, and to start becoming part of the solution instead of remaining part of the problem.


DOREEN’S CASE IS THE MOST OVERT and unmistakable case of raw judicial corruption and systemic assault on the Constitution and the rule of law that has ever been seen. A lot of bad rulings have happened over recent years. But there have been no others in which a federal appellate court has actually argued in a written, published ruling that a statute which reads, “Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command,” doesn’t include “lawfulness” as an element of the offense (therefore a person can be punished for failing to obey an unlawful order).

Here’s another good example:

In no other case in American history has a federal court deliberately– and in a formal “finding” no less– misrepresented the content of a book.

So the lawlessness is unprecedented and so is the reason for it. This unprecedented lawlessness is meant to suppress an equally unprecedented opportunity for the American people.

What all this government lawlessness underscores is the fact that Cracking The Code (CtC) presents to the American people the one and only way that the Leviathan can be cut back down to safe and tolerable size, and true federalism and the rule of law restored. CtC is the red-pill that the masters of the matrix have been hoping would never appear.

How do you tell which plane is right above the target?  The one getting the heaviest flak.

We all expect to see corruption in government every where we look these days. But there has never been anything done before anywhere as has been done in Doreen’s case by United States officials, and in all the preceding events related to Doreen’s case.

 Never before has a DOJ attorney flatly lied in a complaint about the grounds for a suit, with a federal judge repeating the lie in a formal “finding”. Never before has such an attorney resorted to presenting an “informal examination report” as “support” for an allegation of tax liabilities in a civil lawsuit.

Never before have a federal trial court judge and government prosecutor flatly lied to a jury in open court about the content of a statute, while actually holding in their hands the complete and accurate text of the statute they were misrepresenting.

Never before has anyone been ordered, on pain of imprisonment, to withdraw claims against the government and replace them with government-dictated, government-serving, falsely sworn declarations of belief.

GET THE MESSAGE BEING TELEGRAPHED by all these unique, ongoing, and otherwise inexplicable events. All these crimes are being committed to suppress A VERY, VERY BIG DEAL.

You don’t even have to understand why CtC‘s revelations are a big deal, or how they are the sharpened stake poised above the vampire’s breast. All you need to see is the unprecedented thrashing and gnashing of the vampire itself.

 And all you need to DO –in order to drive that stake home and restore real liberty and rule of law — is to help others see the thrashing and gnashing, and then send them here to learn the cause.

I hope you will.

About David Robinson

REVISED: David Robinson is an Author and Journalist living in the mid-coast area of Maine. He is a Graduate and Alumni of the Brunswick Police Academy. He served as a JUROR seated on the Cumberland County, Maine, Grand Jury for the first four-month session of 2014. Publisher Robinson served 3 months of a 4-month sentence for Conspiracy to defraud the United States, at the FCI Berlin minimum security Satellite Camp in Berlin New Hampshire, as retaliation after he and a friend sued the IRS, unsuccessfully, for Unfair Trade Practices, under Title 15 of the US Code. +++ Maine Lawsuit Against The IRS: For Unfair Trade Practices ( +++ Failure to File & Conspiracy: United States vs. Messier & Robinson - No. 2:14-cr-00083-DBH ( +++ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Maine / REPLY BRIEF OF ROBINSON ( +++ Books by David E. Robinson (
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s