To Andrew Cole <> Copy William R. Lucero Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge <>
• Kent Wagner <>
• Andrew Napolitano <>
• <>
• •
• • <>
• • Senator Michael Bennet <> • Blind copy
• • Senator Michael Bennet <> •  Blind copy
Date: 19 June 2017
From the Desk of Steven Duane Curry©
To: Andrew Cole; Administrator;
Colorado Secretary of State
Denver, Colorado

Good Afternoon, Andrew;

If you would be so kind as to review, act upon, file & record the attached text & two PDF files/Affidavits/Notices to my the State records housed in your office, and advise all agents & principals involved as to the content of the the Notice & Affidavit, I would be most grateful.
Keep in mind, William R. Lucero, and Nancy Rice, at the Colorado Supreme Court, are, similar to you & Mr. Williams, and the State Treasurer, my assigned Fiduciaries & Trustees over these critical matters, and they will know how to treat these submissions as in their righteous commercial discharges, dismissals, and set-offs of the ledger.
As previously mentioned, I have several documents left to go in processing my “Retirement” from your State system, and I will be submitting these documents as I complete them.  Please let me know, immediately, should you spot any retrievable omissions, or clear errors, and I will amend the documents as needed to stay in honor.
Thank you, again, Sir, for your Compassion, Courage, Honor, and Integrity!©
In Honor & Good Faith!
Steven Duane Curry; Agent©
All Rights Reserved; without prejudice


RE:  State Court Cases: Case #17CR10124, #16CR0001, #16SA188, #12M265, #2014-C-152, and 2016-CV-11

MAXIM OF LAW: An ‘Unrebutted’ Affidavit Stands as Truth, as well as a Judgement In Commerce. 

Being Duly deposed and Sworn, Affiant, autographed below, states as follows:

I, Steven Duane Curry©, as Agent, and with Power of Attorney in Fact, for STEVEN DUANE CURRY™, and as a Natural, Living-born man, can make no Payment on any debt or obligation to pay pursuant to costs, fees, any contract or fine, settlement, or order of the court, until the appropriate form of payment is clarified and defined by the payee or court, in consideration of the following adopted and incorporated herewith as my duly certified statement of presumed fact in Law:

PREMISE OF LAW FIRSTLY THAT; Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities, as deposits are merely book entries, and it is still a Felony to tender these or any such substitute electronically or otherwise for lawful money in payment of any debt in all fifty states today including Colorado, as Colorado criminal law states “All recognizances, bail bonds & undertakings of any kind, whereby a party becomes bound to pay money to the State, & all fines & forfeitures of a pecuniary character shall be collected in the lawful money [gold or silver] of the United States only,” per 12 USC 411;

AND THAT; The US Supreme Court has ruled that, “Lawful Money of the United States could only be gold & silver coin or that which by law is made its equivalent so as to be exchangeable therefor at par, & on demand, & does NOT include a currency which though nominally exchangeable for coin at its’ face value, is not redeemable on demand.” Bronson v. Rhodes, 74 U.S. 229, 247, 19 L. Ed.141. “Checks, drafts, money orders & bank notes are not lawful money of the United States.”  State v. Mellon, 73 Pac. 321, 43 Ore. 168. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition defines “Real money,” as; “Money which has real metallic, intrinsic value as distinguished from paper currency, checks & drafts.”

“No state may make any thing but gold or silver coin tender in payment of debts.”  Article 1 sec 10, US Constitution, Public Law 103 of Dec. 24, 1919 states; “only gold certificates of the United States payable to bearer on demand shall be and are legal tender in payment of all debts and dues, public and private.” However, “No payment in gold or silver may be demanded in payment of any debt or obligation because of government declared bankruptcy.”  HJR 192; Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; 31 USC 5112, 5119;12 USC 95a; and confirmed in Perry v. U.S. 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912 (1935)“No one is bound to do what is impossible.” – 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 601“A l’impossible nul n’est tenu.”

THAT“The responsibility of coining gold and silver money was by the people ceded to Congress” at Article I; §8, Clause 5, U.S. Constitution. It was certainly not within the enumerated powers of Congressional authority in Law to transfer the issuing of gold and silver certificates, and ultimately supplanting United States Notes with Federal Reserve Notes, to the private Federal Reserve being a foreign power with respect to lawful government, as “Congress may not abdicate [‘to give up.. renounce or relinquish…authorities, duties…powers, or responsibility] to transfer to others its legitimate [delegated] functions.”  Schechter Poultry v. U.S., 29 U.S., 495 U.S. 837, 842 (1935); see footnote below;…

FOOT NOTE : 66th Congress Sess. II Chapter 15(December 24, 1919)-Public Law No. 103, CHAP. 15– An Act to make gold certificates of the United States payable to bearer on demand legal tender.
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that gold certificates of the United States payable to bearer on demand shall be and are hereby made legal tender in payment of all debts and dues, public and private.”  Gold Reserve Act of March 14, 1900; [§3511] Sec. 2That“United States notes, and Treasury notes issued under the Act of July 14, 1890, when presented to the Treasury for redemption, shall be redeemed in gold coin of the standard fixed in the first section of this Act…”  “No law makes Federal Reserve Notes Lawful Money Or Legal Tender, and they do not meet either of these lawful requirements for legal tender for the Citizens of the several states.”

WHEREFORE“Giving a note does not constitute payment…” Echart v Commissioners, C.C.A. 42 F2d 158; 283 U. S. 140; and, “The legal tender quality of paper money is only valuable for the purposes of dishonesty…” Knox v. Lee (1871)“…by agreeing to pay fines, court costs, or any other obligation or debt in commerce or monetary exchange with any private party or public institution by means of “paper money… only valuable for the purpose of dishonesty,” “…whether or not intentionally, willfully, or knowingly, having been under inducement, tricked, or coerced by any criminal element corporate or private, or under color of law in representation of government, into paying any debt, obligation, or fine, in anything other than gold or silver, one would be as such, in law, either pressured, coerced and intimidated, or threatened under duress, drawn into by deceit, or conspiring with criminal intent, to engage in the crime of ‘COUNTERFEITING’ and ‘FORGERY,’ being a felony, and so should and must respectfully decline any offer, and resist or reject any pressure to accept or succumb to any inducement to be drawn into contributing, aiding, or abetting, wether directly or indirectly, any manner of criminality, such as defined in and by law as ‘forgery’ and/or the ‘counterfeiting’ of money or value in any manner.”

AND THAT; when pressured to identify the form of money to be used to settle a judgment, the 52nd 3rd Judicial District Court of Michigan, Honorable Justice James P. Sheehy presiding, Ruled that; “coffee beans” was money, storming out of the court room shouting:; “I don’t care if you pay it in coffee beans just so long as you pay it!”  Montgomery Wards v Eugene Glasure, #82-002087 (1982). The judge, as in many intentionally unpublished state and federal cases, could not bring himself to violate the law in open court on record and declare Federal Reserve Notes to be lawful or legal tender in payment of debts, outside exclusive federal territorial jurisdiction, so Glasure, a Michigan Native, payed the settlement, court costs, and a few of his other debts, in “Coffee Beans,” and still carries a large sack of them around with him at all times down to this very day.

ASSERTION OF LOGICAL CONCLUSION BASED UPON PREMISE OF FACTS ASSERTED AS CONTROLLING LAW: “An argument is valid only if its conclusion follows logically from the combination of its premises.”

WHEREFORE; the alleged ‘Defendant,’ presumed ‘Respondent,’ or ‘Counter-Petitioner,’ can make no payment on any fine, obligation or debt assessed pursuant to the terms and conditions of any court order, contract, bill, invoice or obligation, as such imposed or assessed, until such time as specific clarification of the form of money and appropriate tender in payment by the claimant, obligor, Opposing Counsel, Attorney General, District Attorney, Prosecutor, or Court is made in amendment to the same said bill, Order to pay, invoice, or demand for payment, as herewith requested, in consideration of the forgoing facts in and at Law, and so requests the same be made forthwith, in equity, faith and good conscience.

“No person shall ever be imprisoned for debt.” – Constitution of the State of Texas Art. 1 § 18, 1876“No man can give that which he has not…” “…[nor that which he can not be required to have, such as contraband Federal Reserve Bank Notes counterfeited as money].” Jackson v. Bradford, 4 Wend. (N.Y.) 619“Incarceration to coerce bond is unconstitutional.” Pullman v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984).


WHEREFORE; this Affiant & Counter Petitioner requests the Court, his Honorable Eminence and Excellency in Chancelory, William R. Lucero, employee of opposing counsel for the STATE, fictional corporate client, direct and compel opposing counsel to clarify and identify in writing for the record of these proceedings a suitable and acceptable form of payment under law in amendment to and with respect to fines , Bid Bonds, Performance Bonds, Payment Bonds, assessed or any other obligations to contract, imposed by judgment or presumption of contract, and/or pursuant to 
any void and incomplete contract, judgment or settlement, as a matter of Public Record, void the contract, settlement, or order to pay that in fact which already is; nunc pro tunc ab initio, the same being void for ambiguity and lack of clarification.

LET IT BE KNOWN TO ALL OF YOU through this Affidavit Of Truth & Righteous Declaration, electronically/digitally autographed below, I am not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own mutual good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our law, that we do not offer, nor freely concede, to contracts being brought into existence in our name that Begin and End in fraud, predicated upon criminal acts of counterfeit or forgery, these as such being the poison fruit of an accursed tree, whereas as our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been by us previously published to you, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them, by charter, fealty, demur, or concession. Legalese, legality, and Legalism; the science practiced by attorneys at law in private for profit commercial courts, which by law cannot be the acts of public institutions, thus masquerading as such illegitimately in their legalese of fictions and ghosts without rights being the designations they falsely assign and ascribe to the naturally-born & living, as apposed to being in the Law common to nature and sense in reality, are by most religions taught to be engaging in simple, black magic, witchcraft, and sophistry or double speak, demonic sorcery originating with the father of deceit.

I the undersigned and above named do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing is being served upon opposing counsel by placing a true and correct copy of the same in via electronic mail, all or by my own hand, ‘notice to agent being notice to principle,’ on this the day, the 19th Day of June, in this, the year of our Lord Two Thousand Seventeen A.D.

In the State’s very own legal & corporate language & script, they have accepted, agreed, and have averred, that; As (i) have “unlimited powers to contract,” and my powers & authority predate & exceed that of the State, there is no lawful, or even legal cause, or necessity, to have my copyrighted material, or my natural Living signature, witnessed, authenticated, recognized, approved, or ‘Notarized’ by any agent, or any Deputy Secretary of State, as My Word is my Oath! My Oath is my Bond! My Bond is my Honor! My Honor is a true & genuine expression of my Character! My Character is securely housed in my Spirit! My Spirit is forever bound with the Light of my Soul! My Soul is Private & Unique, and none SHALL Trespass without my Permission, or without my Knowledgeable & Free Willed-Consent

(Electronically/digitally-autographed)      Steven Duane Curry©

Steven Duane; [Curry]™, Beneficiary 

Secured Party Lien Creditor, Authorized Signatory

Attorney-in-fact on behalf of 


Trademark Nineteen Hundred Seventy One

About David Robinson

REVISED: David Robinson is an Author and Journalist living in the mid-coast area of Maine. He is a Graduate and Alumni of the Brunswick Police Academy. He served as a JUROR seated on the Cumberland County, Maine, Grand Jury for the first four-month session of 2014. Publisher Robinson served 3 months of a 4-month sentence for Conspiracy to defraud the United States, at the FCI Berlin minimum security Satellite Camp in Berlin New Hampshire, as retaliation after he and a friend sued the IRS, unsuccessfully, for Unfair Trade Practices, under Title 15 of the US Code. +++ Maine Lawsuit Against The IRS: For Unfair Trade Practices ( +++ Failure to File & Conspiracy: United States vs. Messier & Robinson - No. 2:14-cr-00083-DBH ( +++ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Maine / REPLY BRIEF OF ROBINSON ( +++ Books by David E. Robinson (
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s